Polaris General Forum banner
1 - 13 of 13 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
64 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Thanks. I have to say the component quality is very good. I have the expedition rack too. I should add that the passenger side install of the sliders was more difficult. Like the brackets were just a bit off. Got it done though.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
523 Posts
Thanks. I have to say the component quality is very good. I have the expedition rack too. I should add that the passenger side install of the sliders was more difficult. Like the brackets were just a bit off. Got it done though.
Either the brackets are off or it's another case of Polaris having exceedingly large tolerances in their buildouts.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
 

· Registered
Joined
·
8 Posts
Either the brackets are off or it's another case of Polaris having exceedingly large tolerances in their buildouts.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
From what we have seen the Polaris cages and chassis' have the tightest tolerances compared to the other brands especially Can-Am but we definitely see machines on both ends of tolerances. the cage on a Polaris may vary 1/4" across 5 machines. Can-Am can vary up to 3/4" across the same number of machines.
 

· Premium Member
2018 G4 Ride Command. Black Pearl. 30 inch Maxxis Rampage. Front tender springs, XL Fenders
Joined
·
124 Posts
Most of the frame and sub assemblies are mig welded using robots. The robot will put the weld in the same place every time. There are even seam finding systems in place to allow the robot to find a seam that tends to move around a bit. However the robot is only as good as the parts you feed it. Stamped parts and bent tubing is the worst for consistency when mass produced couple with worn tooling fixtures you get some bolt alignment issues or fit up issues. I do believe that polaris holds pretty tight weld tolerances in the weld shop. I am regional support specialist for one of the large robotic companies. I have to deal with stuff almost daily.

Just my 2 cents.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
12 Posts
Those look great. But the way they mount they will never hold up to any real use or abuse. I wish they would have used a better mounting setup. I’d be a customer for sure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 

· Registered
Joined
·
523 Posts
From what we have seen the Polaris cages and chassis' have the tightest tolerances compared to the other brands especially Can-Am but we definitely see machines on both ends of tolerances. the cage on a Polaris may vary 1/4" across 5 machines. Can-Am can vary up to 3/4" across the same number of machines.
1/4 to 3/4" is still enough to make holes not line up. The aftermarket world has its work cut out for it, that's for sure.

Ask anyone that's ever installed upper doors about tolerances, fit and finish.

Not bashing Polaris solely. Any company putting out product with that much variance and still asking $30k + deserves some bad publicity.

IMO of course.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
 

· Registered
Joined
·
64 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
If you've ever owned an RV you are well prepared for "fit and finish" discussion. :confused:

So far I've been very happy with Polaris quality. My only whining would be about the cost of all this stuff. And that's my own lack of anticipation anyway.

And as far as the bars holding up...... I see what you mean, but you'd have to be in a serious situation to pound them hard enough. They are on pretty well.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
8 Posts
1/4 to 3/4" is still enough to make holes not line up. The aftermarket world has its work cut out for it, that's for sure.

Ask anyone that's ever installed upper doors about tolerances, fit and finish.

Not bashing Polaris solely. Any company putting out product with that much variance and still asking $30k + deserves some bad publicity.

IMO of course.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
Yes, these machines are held no where near the tolerances of the auto industry so it makes designing products that fit every vehicle perfectly difficult.




Most of the frame and sub assemblies are mig welded using robots. The robot will put the weld in the same place every time. There are even seam finding systems in place to allow the robot to find a seam that tends to move around a bit. However the robot is only as good as the parts you feed it. Stamped parts and bent tubing is the worst for consistency when mass produced couple with worn tooling fixtures you get some bolt alignment issues or fit up issues. I do believe that polaris holds pretty tight weld tolerances in the weld shop. I am regional support specialist for one of the large robotic companies. I have to deal with stuff almost daily.

Just my 2 cents.

Nice, we have a few robotic welding machines here and we see it often in manufacturing parts. If 1 part is miss aligned in the fixture or wasnt cut or bent correctly it throws the entire end product out of spec. Polaris tolerances are leaps and bounds above others but not perfect.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
8 Posts
Those look great. But the way they mount they will never hold up to any real use or abuse. I wish they would have used a better mounting setup. I’d be a customer for sure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
We have seen them used and abused. The rock sliders and mounts are stronger than the factory chassis/factory mounting locations and we have tested them over and over. Overbuilt means it's under engineered.
 
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Top