The General has been discussed at length here and elsewhere as it relates to the RZR XP and S models but I cannot help but think there are many potential Ranger defectors out there, including myself.
We know the General suspension is largely based on the RZR S 1000 but how does that suspension compare to Rangers? I put 2,000 miles of very rocky mountainous driving each year and most of that is used hunting, scouting, running trail cameras, etc - purpose driven driving. For a guy who wants to move more comfortably over rough terrain is the General a big improvement over the Ranger?
I have almost 20,000 miles of Ranger driving but have only driven a rzr 800 once many years ago. I am most interested in hearing discussion from those who have seat time in Rangers and the General.
We know the General suspension is largely based on the RZR S 1000 but how does that suspension compare to Rangers? I put 2,000 miles of very rocky mountainous driving each year and most of that is used hunting, scouting, running trail cameras, etc - purpose driven driving. For a guy who wants to move more comfortably over rough terrain is the General a big improvement over the Ranger?
I have almost 20,000 miles of Ranger driving but have only driven a rzr 800 once many years ago. I am most interested in hearing discussion from those who have seat time in Rangers and the General.